General Category > Tamil Bible
Speaking in tongues
(1/3) > >>
The apostles spoke in tongues in acts 2.
the tongues they spoke people were able to hear in their own language??
What does this mean??
Did they speak in a language??
Or did people hear them in their own languages?
I think the question is incorrect
6 Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language.
7 And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans?
8 And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?
The verse clearly says that disciples spoke other languages
Ya,So Apostles spoke in other languages.They didnot speak in an unknown language in Act 2.
Then why is Paul speaking about interpreting tongues in 1 cor 12 :10 and 14 :13,14.
Why did Apostles speak in a language and why did Corinth church speak in unknown language.Even today churches speak in unknown language and calls it tongues??
Why is this difference between Apostles and believers??
There's no any differences
There's problem in your understanding level. Pls read the Bible in proper attention.
Apostle Paul clearly states about tongues in following verse
1 Corinthians 13
1 Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal.
The tongues of men and angels. He talks about the interpretation of Heavenly language.
And I have one question
Are you follower of Christ?
My question is whether there are two types of tongues?
One which the Apostles spoke on Acts 2 .And one which the churches are speaking these days?
Is it so??
In churches when they say speak in tongues, everyone speaks in some unknown language .
But In Acts chapter 2 ,they spoke in a language where everyone was able to understand.
Yes im a believer.
 Message Index
[#] Next pageGo to full version